Skip to: |

Newegg.com - A great place to buy computers, computer parts, electronics, software, accessories, and DVDs online. With great prices, fast shipping, and top-rated customer service - once you know, you Newegg.

If you are reading this message, Please click this link to reload this page.(Do not use your browser's "Refresh" button). Please email us if you're running the latest version of your browser and you still see this message.

Newegg.com - Computer Parts, Laptops, Electronics, HDTVs, Digital Cameras and More!

Limited Time Only! Newegg Premier is now only $29.99/year. Sign up now.
  • Shipping Destination: United States
  • Wish List
  • Feedback
  • Help
Search all
Search
Home
Home > 
Computer Hardware > 
Networking > 
Wireless Networking > 
Wireless Routers > 
TP-LINK > 
Item#: N82E16833704177
TP-LINK Archer C7 v2 AC1750 Wireless Dual Band Gigabit Router IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n
  • Up to 1.75Gbps Wireless Data Rates (450+1300Mbps)
  • 3x5dBi external antennas and 3 internal antennas
  • Dual USB Ports
  • Guest Network Access
  • Full Gigabit Ports
  • Wi-Fi On/Off Button
  • WPA-PSK/WPA2-PSK
  • $139.99
  • $99.99
  • Save: $40.00 (29%)
  • Free Shipping (restrictions apply)

3 out of 5 eggs OK router but I prefer the TL-WDR4300 05/12/2014

This review is from: TP-LINK Archer C7 v2 AC1750 Wireless Dual Band Gigabit Router IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n

Pros:

Received a v2 unit as advertised. Firmware was current out of the box with the initial release, version 3.13.34 Build 131217 Rel.60903n.

Firmware is robust and feature packed. Port forwarding is fairly easy to do, as is using UPnP and changing security settings for the wireless networks, including changing the SSID and creating a WEP or WPA/WPA2 key.

Box includes the router, power cord, 3 external 5GHz removable/pivoting antennas, 1 short (3'?) Cat5e cable, manual, software mini CD.

Gigabit speeds are good. Between my server with a Supermicro X8DA3 board utilizing an Intel PRO 1000 PM Gigabit ethernet adapter, and a secondary workstation with a Gigabyte P45-UD3P utilizing a Realtek 8111C Gigabit ethernet adapter, with Cat5e cables I achieved speeds of 773.9 Mbps upload and 534.3 Mbps download via the LAN Speed Test (Lite) v1.3.1 app.

2.4GHz WiFi signal strength and coverage is also excellent. Choosing 2 spots in the house (at distances of roughly 15' and 25' from the router), my results were as follows:

From 15'
98% average signal
-43 dB, 5/5 bars

From 25'
99% average signal
-55 dB, 5/5 bars

The 2 included USB ports function well for printer and flash drive/HDD sharing over the network.

Router handles concurrent traffic very well. Even with wired and wireless traffic flowing simultaneously between 2 wired computers, a wireless laptop, 3 smartphones and 1 tablet, there were no issues or lock ups. Bandwidth did not seem to be hindered in any way (other than the actual connection I have at home, which is a 30/4Mbps Charter cable connection). I was able to speed test and pull >100% off every device (as is typically the case with Charter - you pay for 30Mbps, yet I usually pull closer to 50-60 down on average).

Cons:

Actual wireless performance and throughput is not even close to rated speeds in my experience.

Again using LAN Speed Test (Lite), on the 2.4GHz spectrum my transfer rates were 48.3Mbps upload and 40.1Mbps download; the rated maximum throughput here on 2.4GHz is 450Mbps, meaning I didn't even achieve 9% of that throughput in my testing. I was even further disappointed by this considering that the AC1750 has 3 separate antennas for each radio spectrum - 3 internal for the 2.4GHz and 3 external for the 5GHz. I expected the performance to be better spectrum vs. spectrum since each band has it's own antennas and the spectrums are not sharing antennas.

I was not able to test the (rated 1,300Mbps) throughput on the 5GHz band, but can verify that the signal strength and coverage of 5GHz is worse than the 2.4GHz by far - again surprising, since the 5GHz antennas are external and quite long. Again, using my 15' and 25' measuring gaps - at 15' the signal was at -61 dB with 4/5 bars, and at 25' the signal was at -66 dB with 3.5/5 bars. This is with the exact same security encryption as the excellent 2.4GHz coverage results above. Given the <1/10th throughput on the 2.4GHz band from my testing, I believe I can safely assume that the 5GHz throughput is no better than 1/10th - meaning "at best", 130Mbps, if the signal is optimal (and in my testing, the 5GHz coverage is definitely weaker, so I wouldn't bet on it).

The power brick is 'morbidly obese'. The router pulls 2.5A based on the label on the bottom, and the power brick is easily the biggest power brick I've seen on a router, ever. I would assume the extra power is required due to the 6 total antennas with this unit.

The shape is odd. The top is somewhat convex, and the only flat part is the bottom. Unless you can prop it up against something (somewhat sideways), the only way to 'sit' the router is on it's bottom.

Other Thoughts:

I'm very happy with my TP-LINK TL-WDR4300 N750 router, which is practically identical in looks and features, at least on the outside, to the Archer C7 AC1750. The main differences you notice on the surface, are the blue lights (N750) vs green lights (AC1750), and the larger power brick on the AC1750. Internally, it's a whole different story - the N750 has no internal antennas, and only the 3 external that are shared with the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands. Again, because of this, I expected the AC1750 to perform at least somewhat better due to having twice as many antennas, and not only that, but having each band on it's own set of 3 antennas. Real world performance, however, shows this not to be the case, in the least.

Both routers have a similar firmware feature set. Plenty of features, lots of bells and whistles, and customization across the board. Many of the same other features - 2 USB 2.0 ports, Guest WiFi network, DDNS built-in.

The key difference here is the N750 is about $30 cheaper on average and performs just as good with wired gigabit throughput, 2.4GHz throughput and coverage, and 5GHz coverage, as the AC1750. Because of that - I cannot soundly recommend the AC1750. It's not a bad router per se, but it's cheaper, smaller brother (the N750) performs just as admirably for quite a bit less.

Share this review:

1 people found this review helpful. Did you? Yes Yes / No No

  • Nick C.
  • EggXpert
  • Owned For: 1 week to 1 month


Home
Home > 
Computer Hardware > 
Networking > 
Wireless Networking > 
Wireless Routers > 
TP-LINK > 
Item#: N82E16833704177
Shop by Region: United States | Canada | China
VeriSign Click for the BBB Business Review of this Computers - Supplies & Parts in Whittier CAThis site protected by Trustwave's Trusted Commerce program Inc500
Policy & Agreement | Privacy Policy  © 2000-2014 Newegg Inc.  All rights reserved.
If the Adobe Reader does not appear when you click on a link for a PDF file, you can download Adobe Reader from the Adobe web site. nassau