Newegg.com - A great place to buy computers, computer parts, electronics, software, accessories, and DVDs online. With great prices, fast shipping, and top-rated customer service - once you know, you Newegg.
If you are reading this message, Please click this link to reload this page.(Do not use your browser's "Refresh" button). Please email us if you're running the latest version of your browser and you still see this message.
Showing Results: Most Recent
Pros: With my old seagate hybrid 1T drive, after the bios screen, my sata controller screen and video card screen, it would take between 3.5-4 minutes to load windows 7 home premium 64bit fully including choosing a user profile. I had rebooted 15-20 times in a row to try and coax the hybrid drive to load things in the SSD portion to get it to boot faster, but I never saw much improvement. Maybe 30 seconds or so over the standard HD.
With the new SSD installed, it takes between 20-30 seconds to be fully booted. And of course, opening any app is significantly faster. Outlook, Firefox, IE, chrome, all of them open near instantly now.
Cons: The only con I have is the software that came with it to clone my current drive would not work no matter what I did or how I plugged things in. It just kept giving me an error message that was nondescript.
I ended up using a free version of Macrium Reflect, which worked flawlessly to clone my old system partition and C: partition to the new SSD.
Once I finished cloning, I booted up on the SSD then installed the intel software to optimize the SSD settings and that software worked fine.
Other Thoughts: I have an older HP desktop that I have upgraded pretty much everything in to deal with ripping my entire DVD/Bluray library over the past 6 months, so I can view everything over DLNA.
I'm running an firstname.lastname@example.orgGhz (quad core/muli-threaded to 8), 12G ram, MSI Nvidia 650Ti vid card, 600W PSU. My on-board sata controller is only Sata 2.
I have a 3T internal seagate for my media drive. I had a 1T hybrid (8G onboard SSD) seagate for my primary boot drive. Supposedly this was faster than a standard HD at booting, starting apps... I honestly didn't notice a difference over the 1.5T seagate drive I was using as my primary.
I have a PCI-E 4 port Sata 3 card coming in the mail. Not sure if it will work well as a boot device and pretty sure since I only have PCI-E x1 capable on my MB, I won't see the full potential of SATA3. I'll find out though in a week or so.
I've only had the drive in and running for 4 or 5 days. I have ripped a few blu-rays and DVD's which I have the source of on another drive but have handbrake building the mp4 on the SSD. It ran for 9-10 hours converting everything I queued overnight running the cpu at 100% the entire time. It's not really drive intensive, but it does frequently write data and had the drive running at about 20% utilization the entire time while running the normal HD at 30%+ to read the source.
Pros: Installed fine like any typical HDD.
Cons: No issues yet.
Other Thoughts: Thought this was supposed to be "faster" than a standard HDD, but didn't notice any improvement really with booting or opening of outlook/firefox/handbrake... anything really.
Guess I'll just save up for a SSD.
If your thinking of buying, just get a 7500rpm 2T drive instead.