Triple Monitor on HD 46006/26/2013 8:35:34 PM

Pros: I am letting the HD4600 drive three monitors using Ubuntu Linux. A 2560X1440 flanked by a pair of 1920X1200s.

Cons: The board does not boot up (does not reach bios splash) if my usb3 HD is plugged in. A strange but minor annoyance.

Overall Review: None

5 out of 5 people found this review helpful. Did you? 
Quiet6/26/2013 8:30:50 PM

Pros: An excellent quiet and efficient PS for basic builds.

Cons: I wish I could have got this in a 200W model that was perhaps even more efficient.

Overall Review: Isn't it time to get rid of the floppy power connector? Also, I doubt many people would miss the non-SATA connectors.

Did you find this review helpful? 
Works6/26/2013 8:27:30 PM

Pros: Pop them in and they work just fine at the specified timings.

Cons: None

Overall Review: None

2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Did you? 
Nice Chip6/26/2013 8:25:30 PM

Pros: Perfect for people how like to run at stock clocks and don't care for Hype-threading. For several days was selling this for $25 less than usual but for some reason they never bothered to advertise the sale. Fast. Quiet. Power efficient. The HD 4600 drives 3 monitors simultaneously, a 2560X1440 flanked by a pair of 1920X1200 (make sure your motherboard supports this) and I am doing this in Ubuntu Linux.

Cons: Shouldn't octo-core CPUs be mainstream by now?

Overall Review: Intel has too many slightly different CPU models and chipsets.

6 out of 9 people found this review helpful. Did you? 
Compact and Airy4/19/2013 7:01:33 PM

Pros: Compact. Lots of ventilation. Thumbscrews.

Cons: Lightweight.

Overall Review: Nice and squarish once you rip the front panel off. I have a few of these for a mini cluster and I find them easy to stack and access, plus they breath well with stock cooling.

Did you find this review helpful? 
Solid computing power4/19/2013 6:03:09 PM

Pros: Lots of raw computing power. Official support for DDR3-1600. Low 77 Watt power envelope.

Cons: Socket 1155 boards seem a little more pricey then I would like but that is likely due to the many features that I do not use.

Overall Review: After experimenting with some overclocked CPUs, beyond standard memory speeds, and HYPE-rthreading, I have found that Intel's best non-K non-Hypertreading, quad-cores gives the best value for my needs. I am running 8 of these things, on standard cooling, in compact FMB-01 cases, 80+ Corsair 430 W, 2*8 GB ram, and a 64 GB intel SSD. These 8 nodes of my mini-HPC cluster is fed from a single plug. And since everything is running within specification I no longer have an abundance of memory errors or misbehaving OCed cpus, just nice computing reliability for an affordable price. Also relatively quiet and not too hot.

2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Did you? 
works in x2208/11/2011 11:08:52 AM

Pros: Works well in my thinkpad x220. Good value.

Cons: Seems like the price keeps going down. Now an even better value.

Did you find this review helpful? 
Verified Owner
Ownership: 1 month to 1 year
Fits Thinkpad x2208/11/2011 11:05:29 AM

Pros: Fits my x220 (slide out the old drive and insert the solid3, without the bracket). Got my rebate. Works well.

Cons: Seems that random input/output is less capable than on the higher grades of OCZ drives, but I have not compared for myself.

Did you find this review helpful? 
It works8/11/2011 11:01:49 AM

Pros: Works great with 16 GB of 2133 MHz ram.

Cons: I don't care for the new style bios but I suppose it is better than the old style.

0 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Did you? 
Workhorse8/11/2011 10:59:50 AM

Pros: Sturdy, well built, roomy, ssd mount, quality power supply, good looking, superb ventilation, good value.

Cons: The lowest fan speed (out of 3 speeds) is probably the only speed where the noise is tolerable. They should included a lower speed setting.

Overall Review: I use this case for making compute nodes. The ventilation makes is unnecessary to get after-market cooling for 2500K's clocked at 4.2GHz.

Did you find this review helpful? 
Fantastic8/11/2011 10:46:01 AM

Pros: Two kits (16 GB) worked great on a ASUS P8P67 board at the rated speed.

Cons: The shellshock price combined with the i7-2600 combo and the P8P67 combo made the price ridiculously cheap. The con is that the price is not always this low, however, I would still consider buying this at the regular price.

Overall Review: Good Value for Good RAM.

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Did you? 
Fast, nice, cheap1/31/2011 7:09:24 PM

Pros: 2 sticks of this runs nicely in my Gigabyte P67A-UD3 board at the default timings, 2133 MHz, and 1.6 V. Reasonably priced.

Cons: I had to insert them in DDR slots #2 and #4, as they would not run above 1833 MHz when inserted in slots #1 and #3. Might be a problem if you used 4 sticks.

Overall Review: They make a noticeable difference. I measured (using ramsmp in linux running on an i7 2600 at 4.2 GHz) this ram at about 29.8 GB/s read vs about 26.6 GB/s when using my old 2000 MHz Tridents running at 1866 MHz. This translates into a worthwhile performance boost for memory intensive tasks but is likely useless for most people.

7 out of 7 people found this review helpful. Did you?