Showing Results: Most Recent
This review is from: Linksys AC1900 Dual Band SMART Wi-Fi Gigabit Router (EA6900)
Pros: -Standard form-factor
-Wall mount/antennae adjustability options
-True dual-band with the added benefit of the 802.11ac tech
-Simplistic interface (A Pro for some)
-USB 2.0 & 3.0 Ports
-4 horizontal Gigabit ports (vertical ports on some form factors annoy me)
-Web access functionality would be nice for someone who didn’t have a static IP or was more of a networking newb, but it was not needed in my situation
Cons: -Runs pretty warm – situate it in a well ventilated area
-If you want to run the “wizard” to auto-connect your Internet connection, you have to do it right at the beginning or you will have to re-set it to Factory Default to do it later (It does warn you of this)
-Odd placement of the ‘Reset to Factory Default’ option under the Security tab, rather than under the Admin tab, as typical
-Not a whole lot of customization in the advanced settings (naming of various profiles/configurations)
The following three Cons are from my perspective & needs, but don’t universally apply:
-Simplistic parental controls
-No support for 3rd Party firmware
Other Thoughts: My review is from the perspective of a power user in a 2-level home with a robust network (20+ active wired nodes, mostly in the basement) and many wireless devices on the main level, which has been covered by a D-Link DIR-868L at one end and a D-Link DAP-1650 wireless extender at the other with Gigabit wired connectivity throughout. I have upgraded through several different D-Link routers, which have all served me well for almost 10 years (and the oldest one is still running on the network as a switch). I say this so that you understand I am very happy with the current setup. Enter the EA6900, which uses the “original” router form-factor of a “box” with antennae sticking up off the back. Beyond all of the local wired/wireless access going on, I also serve out 2 websites from my main server and have multiple Virtual Server forwarding rules for external RDP access. So, I need quite a bit from the main router beyond the local access control. My main website is used by 4 of us who implement software all around the state (as well as IT support folk) and that speaks to my need for reliability.
I swapped the DIR-868L for the EA6900 on a Friday evening and using the “wizard” process, it auto-recognized my cable modem and configured itself. The wired network functionality was up to par for Gigabit and I was expecting nothing less. I tested wireless using an Intel Wireless AC 7260 adapter (internal Mini-PCI Express used in two of my laptops) and it did score pretty close in LAN Speed Test to the DIR-868L at 125Mbps upload/275Mbps download (125/275) on the 5GHz Band with slightly lower scores on the 2.4GHz Band. The DIR-868L averages 130/300. As mentioned in the cons, this device has basic parental control functionality and I place high priority on the extensive Parental Controls offered by D-Link. Knowing that it wouldn’t meet those needs, I didn’t see the point of doing all of the other configuration needed for web/remote access, so I had the DIR-868L back in place before the new work week began. I covered other specifics in the Pros and Cons and don’t see the need to expound here further.
I titled this review “Set it and forget it or, possibly, forget it altogether” – My meaning was that if you are looking for a simple-to-use router that has reasonably good tech, buy it. If you want more extensive functionality, you’ll want to look elsewhere. I gave it 4 eggs for ease of use and good performance on both wireless bands. I dinged it an egg because, at the current going rate of ~$175 for new, it is not a great value. I could say it is a good value if you can get one used, as they are going for almost half of what the new ones are.
This review is from: Seagate 500GB USB 2.0 / WiFi Wireless Mobile External Hard Drive STDC500402 Red
Pros: -Red & black plastic enclosure make it easy to find
-It has decent transfer speeds with USB 2.0
-It has a fairly simplistic interface for setup and usage
-The wireless access is reasonably fast and kept up fine with a 2GB, 2000Kbps bitrate movie streaming to my iPhone.
-It has decent battery life for its size and it will get you through a movie or two on battery power. Because it is powered by USB, which is ubiquitous these days, I would recommend keeping it plugged in as much as possible.
-Supports m3u playlists
-At first, I thought the User Manual was rather minimal, but I then discovered that Seagate has User Manuals for iOS, Android and the Windows 8 app on their website.
-It has the ability to upload/dowload files from your mobile device using the wireless connection.
Cons: -Samba-mount access of the files would be an ideal option
-You are locked into the 500GB HDD size, which may be fine for many users. Having used an Iogear MediaShair, I am able to keep my whole library with me on a 5TB HDD.
-With its square shape, it is too big/odd-shaped for standard portable HDD cases.
-The Windows 8 app is rather intrusive and made itself the default application for a variety of file types in Windows, including MS Office file types like .docx, .xlsx, etc.
Other Thoughts: The all-in-one concept is great and I imagine for some users, 500GB is enough for their portable AV needs. I have been using an Iogear MediaShair Wireless Media Hub for a while now and some of my comparisons here will be with that device. With this Seagate Wireless device, you get a device that is quite a bit bigger than a typical portable HDD that has the storage, battery & wireless interface all-in-one. Setup is fairly straightforward, provided you already have a bunch of digital media files ready to move to it. I have been slowly standardizing my home digital video collection to MP4 H264 with AAC and bitrates in the 1K to 2K Kbps range. This seems to be the standard these days and it meets all of our family’s needs.
Finding/installing the Seagate Media app in the Apple App Store was easy enough and the interface has two, standard options: #1 is Library view, which create listings based on what types of files are in the collection. #2 is Folder view, which shows the folder structure and is my preference, since that is how we find/access media on our home Media Centers. Running the Seagate Wireless app on my iPhone 6 Plus, I was able to play our standard-sized MP4 videos without an issue. Where I think this device really shines is for audio playback, especially since it supports .m3u playlists (and possibly other playlist formats). For my own usage, I am Windows-centric and wanted to see how it did there. In that environment, you can access the setup features and the media files via a web browser or using the Seagate Media app that is accessible in Windows 8 through the Microsoft Store. The issue mentioned in the cons soured me on playing media using the app.
Now onto the review title and final thoughts... I brought this device with me on a work trip and had just finished testing/running media on my iPhone and was going to do the same testing in Android. I had been listening to some music on the flight home and had, like a goofus, put it in the seat pocket. When the flight arrived, I forgot about it until I had gotten out of the airport. At that point, I pulled over and called Delta, but was directed to their lost items website. I immediately submitted the information and fully expected that I would get the notification a day or two later that it was found. I have left my tablet in the seat pocket on two previous occasions and didn’t even get out of the terminal before they found me to return it. So, I figured that because this was a lower value item, that I would get it back, but the review title spoiled the ending. After 3 weeks of waiting to get the notification that it was found, I received the notification that it had not been found and that the case was closed. A painful lesson learned, both regarding not putting anything in the seat pocket and that theft even among business travelers exists. My overall review is 4 eggs for the fact that the function I felt this device does the best is music playback.
Pros: Simple design with the aluminum case and the new OCZ logo design that covers the top of the drive, super-fast write speeds – as fast as I have ever experienced.
Cons: No extras with this drive, not even a plastic shim to make it thicker if needed. This drive is 6.7mm thick and in the case I have mine in, it goes in a slot that was designed for a 9mm thick drive. Because some laptop mounting options depend on the thickness of the drive being a certain amount, make sure you plan ahead with this drive.
Other Thoughts: Whenever possible, I configure systems that have a SSD for the system and application files and a mechanical drive (or drives in RAID) for the media files (Documents, Music, Video, Games, etc.) For that purpose, the 120GB SSD is perfect and several of my systems get by on a 60GB SSD for the same purpose. This drive is also perfect for that purpose and I have been extremely impressed with the write speeds on this drive. I decided to clone an existing Intel 120GB SSD (SSDSC2BW12) that I had Windows 8.1 installed on to the ARC 100 and I was floored when the whole clone only took about 2 minutes from start to finish. Once I booted up the system, I was seeing amazing Sequential Read speeds of 411 MB/s and even more amazing Write speeds of 377 MB/s. Before I had pulled the Intel, I had also checked its speeds and although it was competitive on the Read speeds, Write speeds were only MB/s. Of course, I don’t buy Intel drives for their speeds, but more for the reliability and 5 year warrantee. Still, I have many OCZ drives in the “fleet” and they have served me well. On the occasion of one failing, their customer support has helpful in getting me a new drive, so complaints there. 5 eggs for the bargain with top-end speeds that is the OCZ ARC 100.READ FULL REVIEW
Display Name: Rob H.
Date Joined: 03/11/03
Some manufacturers place restrictions on how details of their products may be communicated.