Question 1

Should I choose Dell ME5012 or Dell ME5024?

Accepted Answer

Choose the Dell ME5012 when you want a 2U dual-controller array built around 12 large 3.5-inch bays, which is usually the better fit for capacity-first deployments using NL-SAS HDDs over iSCSI. Choose the Dell ME5024 when you need the same ME5 platform in a denser 24-bay 2.5-inch format that is better aligned with higher spindle counts, more SSD-heavy configurations, or mixed performance-oriented workloads. The decision is mainly about drive form factor and workload profile rather than management features, because both are part of the same ME5 family.

Question 2

Is Dell ME5012 a better choice than Dell ME4012?

Accepted Answer

The Dell ME5012 is the better choice for a new deployment when you want the newer ME5 platform, broader current protocol options, and stronger performance headroom. Dell positions ME5 as the newer generation, and third-party testing consistently describes meaningful gains over ME4 in controller capability and throughput. The ME4012 still makes sense when you are matching an existing ME4 environment, but for a fresh purchase the ME5012 is the more forward-looking option.

Question 3

Should I buy Dell ME5012 or move up to Dell ME5084?

Accepted Answer

Choose the Dell ME5012 when you need shared block storage with dual controllers in a compact 2U footprint and your priority is straightforward deployment for SMB or edge workloads. Move up to the Dell ME5084 when your buying decision is driven by much higher base drive count, larger scale-out plans, or a capacity-dense 5U platform from day one. In practice, the ME5012 fits smaller and mid-sized SAN deployments more cleanly, while the ME5084 is the better fit when rack space per drive and long-term raw capacity matter more than chassis compactness.

Question 4

Is Dell ME5012 better for capacity-focused storage or performance-first storage?

Accepted Answer

The Dell ME5012 is usually the better choice for capacity-focused or balanced shared storage, especially when you want 3.5-inch media, dual controllers, and iSCSI connectivity in a compact chassis. It can support hybrid or flash-assisted configurations, but performance-first builds often align more naturally with the ME5024 because 2.5-inch drive layouts are better suited to dense SSD populations and higher spindle counts. If your main goal is economical shared block storage with room for larger drives, the ME5012 is the more natural fit.

Question 5

Does this barebone ME5012 include drives, or is it just the enclosure?

Accepted Answer

It is a barebone storage array, so buyers should expect the enclosure, dual controllers, redundant power supplies, and rails, but not a CPU or preinstalled drives unless the listing explicitly says otherwise. This is an infrastructure purchase for building out shared block storage, not a ready-to-use system with storage media included.

Question 6

Who is the Dell ME5012 suitable for?

Accepted Answer

The ME5012 is suitable for businesses that need shared block storage for servers or virtualization hosts and want a rackmount array with redundancy. It fits IT environments that plan storage at the infrastructure level, especially where dual controllers and iSCSI connectivity matter more than plug-and-play simplicity.

Question 7

Is this a good choice if I want simple plug-and-play network storage?

Accepted Answer

Usually no. The ME5012 is better suited to managed server storage deployments than simple file-sharing use. Its iSCSI design, rackmount form factor, and controller-based architecture make it a stronger fit for IT admins who need block storage and redundancy, but a weaker fit for buyers who want an easy desktop-style NAS experience.

Question 8

What are the main trade-offs of choosing this 12-bay dual-controller enclosure?

Accepted Answer

The main benefits are redundancy, rack integration, and room for 12 large-form-factor drives in a shared storage platform. The trade-offs are higher deployment complexity, the need to supply compatible drives and host-side networking, and a setup that is more infrastructure-focused than beginner-friendly. It is a practical choice when availability and centralized storage matter more than simplicity.

Question 9

Is iSCSI the right interface for this product?

Accepted Answer

iSCSI is the right fit if you want block storage presented over Ethernet to servers, such as for virtualization, clustered workloads, or centralized storage pools. It is less suitable if your priority is direct consumer-style file access out of the box. For this product, iSCSI is a core buying reason, not just a secondary feature.

Question 10

Who is the Dell ME5012 iSCSI model best suited for?

Accepted Answer

The ME5012 is best suited for small to mid-size business shared storage deployments that need a rackmount array with dual controllers, 12 large-form-factor bays, and iSCSI connectivity. It fits virtualization and general infrastructure use better than single-server local storage, but it is not a simple plug-in DAS box for casual use.

Question 11

Is the ME5012 a good choice if I want shared storage over iSCSI rather than direct-attached storage?

Accepted Answer

Yes, if your goal is shared block storage over the network. The listed model is the iSCSI version, and community discussion around ME5 commonly centers on connecting multiple hosts, clustering, and SAN-style use. It is a better fit for shared storage workflows than for buyers expecting a simple direct-attached enclosure.

Question 12

What are the main trade-offs of buying this barebone ME5012 listing?

Accepted Answer

The main trade-off is that this is a storage barebone, not a complete turnkey system. You get the 12-bay chassis, dual controllers, redundant 580W power supplies, rails, and iSCSI connectivity, but no CPU and no indication of included drives. That makes it suitable for buyers who already understand SAN deployment, but less suitable for anyone expecting a ready-to-run storage server.

Question 13

Is the ME5012 worth buying for VMware or Hyper-V environments?

Accepted Answer

It can be a sensible option for virtualization if you need shared block storage with controller redundancy, especially for clustered or multi-host setups. The main caution from community discussion is planning datastore and LUN sizes carefully, because virtualization platform limits and expansion design matter as much as the array hardware itself.

Question 14

When should I avoid the ME5012?

Accepted Answer

Avoid it if you want a low-complexity file server, built-in CPU-based compute, or an appliance that works like ordinary external storage. It is better for admins who specifically want a managed iSCSI SAN with dual controllers and rack deployment. If you need simple file sharing or consumer-style setup, this class of product is usually more complex than necessary.

Brand	Dell
Series	PowerEdge ME5012
Model	ME5012

CPU Type	None (Storage device, no CPU included)
CPU Socket	None (Storage device, no CPU socket)

Meet Your Seller

Dell ME5012 (3.5 - inch / 12 - bay) barebone, dual - control, 580W redundant, rails, ISCSI

Used - Like New

The Dell PowerEdge ME5012 is a 12-bay 3.5-inch storage array barebone with dual controllers, redundant 580W power supplies, rails, and iSCSI connectivity, making it well suited for businesses building shared block storage for virtualization, backup, and general data center workloads.

Learn more about the DELL ME5012

Warranty & Returns

Warranty, Returns, And Additional Information

Warranty

Return Policies

Manufacturer Contact Info

Item#: 9SIC3YKKSP4565