Showing Results: Most Recent
This review is from: Razer Tiamat 7.1 Surround Sound Over Ear PC Gaming Headset
Pros: Physical sound drivers make 3D sound locating better than virtual / simulated 3D sound.
Excellent for earlier COD games such as Modern Warfare 4. Black Ops muffles positional sound to prevent users from taking advantage of players without headphones.
BF3 / BF4 / Hardline's positional audio also works great for these headphones.
Games with high ambient sounds or scripted "scare" sounds come through with greater realism and direction. Dead Space, Resident Evil, Silent Hill etc...
Cons: Buzzing when using USB ports built into the Motherboard.
Buzzing is removed when using a powered USB wall wart as they are called (phone charger).
Often on sale / Black Friday, that's when I would pounce on these.
Have to use the 7.1 for full effect, otherwise it's a waste of money, so invest in a soundcard if your motherboard does not have a built-in 7.1 audio chipset. I.e. if you don't have Green, Pink, Grey, Black, and Orange inputs for Audio (blue is line-in), get a sound card.
Heavy, so you should position yourself with good posture to avoid cramping / stiff necks.
Other Thoughts: Great product even though Razer's taking hits on release quality products.READ FULL REVIEW
Pros: * Matches 90% of the performance of an i7 4770K, when overclocked 20%.
* Can overclock 10~30% over stock frequencies.
* Processor /w high-end motherboard about 50% cheaper than an i7 4770K w/ matching high-end motherboard.
* Performs better in newer console ported titles due to the eight threads being fully utilized.
Cons: * Still not as fast as last gen Intel quad cores with Hyper Threading.
* Runs warm and power hungry, invest in a good motherboard, PSU, and cooler.
* Does not perform as well in video games that depend one one or two strong threads.
* Should not be paired with systems using more than 2 GPUs, they will be inherently bottle necked in terms of performance and GPU usgae.
Other Thoughts: It's great price/performance ratio when compared to what you get from an Intel Motherboard combo, but will nearly always be slower in benchmarks/gaming compared to Intel's current gen.
Still happy with my purchase.
Pros: They work at advertised timings and speed.
They work at advertised timings and speed in all 4 dimms.
I want to point out, that those Pros (are exactly what you expect from all RAM), but they worked without tweaking.
That is a first for me. It didn't even break a sweat on my motherboard or CPU IMC. I feel they have a huge overclock potential.
Dual Channel Kit that is on par with the lower ended Triple Channel Kit (which is very very good.)
Cons: Required a nominal voltage increase to pass POST.
Heatsinks/spreaders too tall, and WILL be problematic for
large CPU heatsink owners (stop pushing WATER COOLING already!!!! I get it, I am behind!)
Other Thoughts: Voltage:
Latency @ stock speeds, 41.3 ns (avg)
Latency @ 3000 NB, 32.9 ns (avg)
Latency @ 1090T @ 4.2 GHz + 3000 NB, 32.3 ns (avg)
Read @ 12,700 MB/s (avg and rounded down)
Write @ 10,300 MB/s (avg and rounded down)
Took 1.7125v instead of 1.65v. Not a complaint really, but it is above advertised. Considering I am using a Crosshair IV which they were specifically catered too, I feel it should be mentioned.
Display Name: Tristan H.
Date Joined: 03/01/10
Some manufacturers place restrictions on how details of their products may be communicated.