Skip to: | - A great place to buy computers, computer parts, electronics, software, accessories, and DVDs online. With great prices, fast shipping, and top-rated customer service - once you know, you Newegg.

If you are reading this message, Please click this link to reload this page.(Do not use your browser's "Refresh" button). Please email us if you're running the latest version of your browser and you still see this message. - Computer Parts, Laptops, Electronics, HDTVs, Digital Cameras and More!

  • Wish List
  • Feedback
  • Help
Search all
Home > 
Robert N.'s Profile > 
All Reviews
  • Find Reviews
  • Find

Showing Results: Most Recent

OCZ Vector 150 Series VTR150-25SAT3-120G 2.5
  • Owned For: 1 week to 1 month

5 out of 5 eggs Using as Write Back Cache for Storage Spaces (Windows Server 2012 R2) 09/13/2014

This review is from: OCZ Vector 150 Series VTR150-25SAT3-120G 2.5" 120GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)

Pros: I haven't used these as main drives but using them as Write Back Cache for Storage Spaces. I wanted to use Parity but the write performance hit was a down factor in Storage Spaces.
To compensate I used 3x OCZ Vector 150 120GB SSD's for their steady state performance and 5 year warranty.

Transferred files over the home network (Around 4-6 TB so far) with no issues and the speeds were consistent on large files at home. (I wasn't using SMB3 or have a 10Gig network at home) It was over 100MB/s consistent on large files and went as low as 60MB/s on smaller files but quickly jumped back up to 100MB/s +

Before write-back cache and SSD's, the write performance on Storage Spaces for Parity was roughly 25-35MB/s (roughly USB 2.0 Speeds)

Cons: None as of yet for these drives.

Other Thoughts: OCZ drives have always been top performers but from my experience the reliability wasn't there. I would always recommend either Crucial, Samsung, or Intel because I have had 0 drive failures.

I've had very bad experience in the past with OCZ drives (before Toshiba acquisition) so it makes me weary in using their drives as main drives. My opinion may slowly change though as time passes.

Kingston SSDNow V300 Series SV300S37A/120G 2.5
  • Verified Owner
  • Owned For: 1 month to 1 year

Pros: Boots into Windows fast, that's about it.

Cons: Be careful of technical specs listed on Newegg for this drive. It's not true comparison when comparing to other manufacturer's.

I used an old laptop (SATA II / 3Gb/s) to perform the test using Crystal Disk Mark with Paragon Migration Software to migrate/copy it from Kingston V300 120GB (higher spec'ed) to a Crucial M500 120GB (lower spec'ed).

Results: READ (MB/s) | Write (MB/s)
Kingston V300 120GB:
Seq.: 172.6 | 136
512K: 160.5 | 512K: 72.46
4K: 12.87 | 4K: 11.74
4K QD32: 66.36 | 4K QD32: 81.32

Crucial M500 120GB:
Seq.: 258.8 | 143.9
512K: 238.7 | 512K: 143.8
4K: 13.02 | 4K: 25.83
4K QD32: 106.5 | 4K QD32: 92.60

Laptop Specs used to perform test on both SSD's:
Model: Toshiba T135-S1305
CPU: Intel SU4100
Memory: G. Skill 4GB
OS: Windows 7 64-bit

What prompted me to perform this test was I installed this drive on another laptop. I never questioned it but when I performed a clean install of Windows 7 on the Kingston V300, the Windows Updates took longer than usual to update. I didn't think anything of it but thought it was odd.

1-2 months later I purchased the Kingston V300 SSD and installed it on the Toshiba laptop I have above. Clean Windows 7 install and everything but Windows Updates took very long to install (I estimate 2-3 hours). This is when I started seeing reviews on Newegg around Jan/Feb. regarding the possibility of firmware/NAND change.

Fast forward now I decided to run a benchmark (not ATTO but Crystal Disk Mark because it represents more real world) on both SSD's. I first ran it on Kingston, then I performed the Migration with Paragon's software to Crucial's SSD. I then ran the same program for the benchmark. The results above is what you see.

This would explain why the Kingston SSD took long to even install Windows Updates.

Other Thoughts: This drive is faster than a HDD, but not by much. Spend a few bucks more and get better performing SSD or just use the money you would otherwise spend on this Kingston SSD and get a higher capacity HDD.

Given this experience I will no longer purchase Kingston products for personal use. Nor recommend and purchase Kingston products where I am currently employed.

Foxconn nT535-0h0w-B-A-NA Intel NM10 1 x 204Pin SO-DIMM Intel GMA 3150 Mini / Booksize Barebone System
  • Verified Owner
  • Owned For: 1 week to 1 month

Pros: Very neat little box. Enough for basic internet usage.
- Upgraded the wireless to Centrino N 6230 (2.4GHz and 5GHz)
- Max memory at 4GB (used G.Skill F3-8500CL7S-4GBSQ | N82E16820231265)
- VESA mount

Cons: Very picky with memory. Would not work with GeIL GS34GB1333C9SC

Other Thoughts: Great for casual PC users. I mounted this behind the monitor and use a wireless keyboard / mouse. (Great space saving)

Not sure how this machine runs with a SSD, I have a 1TB HDD on this machine.

This is my 3rd nettop box with Foxconn, so far i'm 3/3 and no DOA.


Robert N.'s Profile

Display Name: Robert N.

Date Joined: 01/03/03

  • Reviews: 6
  • Helpfulness: 4
  • First Review: 01/29/11
  • Last Review: 09/13/14
Shop by Region: United States | Canada | China | Taiwan
VeriSign Click for the BBB Business Review of this Computers - Supplies & Parts in Whittier CAThis site protected by Trustwave's Trusted Commerce program Inc500
Policy & Agreement | Privacy Policy  © 2000-2015 Newegg Inc.  All rights reserved.
If the Adobe Reader does not appear when you click on a link for a PDF file, you can download Adobe Reader from the Adobe web site.