Are Premium SSD Brands Worth the Cost?

Are Premium SSD Brands Worth the Cost? A Deep Dive into Reliability, Speed, and Customer Perception

When the PC market transitioned to primarily using SSDs for boot drives about 10 years ago, it became one of the most incredible components in modern computing, dramatically improving boot times and application loading speed. As a result, now the market is flooded with options, from popular premium names to more budget-focused alternatives. With the number of options reaching an all-time high, this begs a poignant question: is the premium price tag commanded by top-tier brands actually justified, or are you simply paying for a recognizable name?

This article aims to examine the core metrics of modern SSDs including speed, reliability, warranty, and price, across premium and budget SSD brands, in order to uncover where the value truly lies.


Category 1: The Premium SSD Brands


Pictured: the marketing image for Samsung’s “9100 Pro” SSD, featuring prominent references to PS5 compatibility and being #1 for 21 years.

Key Players: Samsung, Crucial (owned by Micron), Western Digital (particularly WD Black), Corsair

These brands often control the entire process, manufacturing their own NAND flash, controllers, and firmware. This vertical integration is their core advantage, allowing for tight quality control and optimization.

Metric Premium Brands (e.g., Samsung 990 Pro, WD Black SN850X) Analysis
Speed These drives hold nothing back, offering top-of-the-line sequential and random I/O performance (up to 7,450 MB/s read for Gen4 drives, for example). These drives often define the peak performance of a given interface generation (PCIe 4.0 or 5.0). They are optimized for sustained, heavy workloads (e.g., 4K video editing, large file transfers).
Reliability Generally considered the gold standard. High Total Bytes Written (TBW) ratings and Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF). Their reputation is built on consistency and using high-quality components, which translates to fewer widespread firmware issues or sudden, unexplained failures.
Warranty Typically a standard 5-year limited warranty, depending on brand and model. The industry standard for high-end consumer drives. This long period signals confidence in the drive’s endurance and reliability.
Price Significantly higher price-per-gigabyte (often 20-40% more expensive than value alternatives with similar sequential speeds). The primary drawback. Buyers pay a premium for the high speed, reliability, support, and the brand’s reputation. When the marketing materials tell you “#1 for 21 years,” it’s basically a guarantee they’re overcharging while trying to play into their reputation.
Customer Perception (The “Coziness Factor”) Extremely High. Buyers feel they are getting the absolute “best-in-class” product, providing peace of mind. Crucially (pun intended), this perceived security of “coziness” often offers no tangible, real-world performance advantage for the average user. For gaming and general computing, the speed difference between a top-tier and a good value drive is practically always imperceptible.

Category 2: The Value-Focused SSD Brands


Pictured: the marketing material for Silicon Power’s US75 2TB NVMe SSD w/heatsink. No frills, just a photo of what the drive looks like. We like that. In case you were wondering, yes, it’s PS5 compatible.

Key Players: ADATA (XPG), Kioxia, Silicon Power, Team Group

These companies typically purchase NAND flash and controllers from third-party suppliers (e.g., Phison, Silicon Motion) and integrate them into their own designs. They compete fiercely on price and performance-per-dollar.

Metric Value Brands (e.g., Silicon Power US75, Team Group MP44) Analysis
Speed Excellent sequential speeds, often matching premium brands (up to 7,000 MB/s read for Gen4 drives, for example). Random I/O and sustained write performance can be slightly lower. For the vast majority of users, including gamers, these drives offer performance that is functionally identical to premium drives. They saturate the PCIe interface for typical workloads like loading games and applications.
Reliability Good, but historically inconsistent. While many models are highly reliable, some products have seen component changes mid-cycle or occasional firmware issues. Users must rely more heavily on recent, specific product reviews. A drive’s reliability is tied to its specific controller and NAND combination, which can change without notice.
Warranty Typically a 3-5 year limited warranty. The 5-year warranty is becoming more common, but always check the accompanying TBW rating. Lower-cost drives may have a lower TBW, meaning the warranty is voided sooner under heavy use.
Price Highly competitive and often significantly cheaper. This is the primary selling point. The low price-per-gigabyte makes them the definitive choice for users prioritizing capacity and excellent speed while watching their build budget. For example, a 4TB drive from a value brand can be $50-$100 cheaper than a premium equivalent.
Customer Perception (The “Coziness Factor”) Moderate-to-low. Buyers are happy with the performance-to-price ratio but may worry slightly more about long-term reliability due to lower brand recognition. Sometimes it’s down a simple lack of customer knowledge, such as Kioxia being the former Toshiba, a huge name brand in the memory sector. The perceived risk is what premium brands leverage. However, recent models from top value manufacturers like Silicon Power have closed the performance gap while offering very competitive endurance ratings (TBW).

Technical Distinction: Where the Premium Price Pays Off

For 95% of users, the performance gap between a top-tier PCIe 4.0 drive (like the Samsung 990 Pro) and a top-value PCIe 4.0 drive (like the Silicon Power US75) is undetectable in real-world scenarios.

The premium cost is only justified by one technical factor: Sustained Write Performance. Premium drives with dedicated DRAM cache and better-optimized controllers maintain peak write speeds for much longer when moving massive files (e.g., over 100GB at once). Value drives often see a more pronounced drop-off once their SLC cache is exhausted. For video editors who move large files around often, this can be a key factor.

However, sometimes more expensive drives are worse. This is specifically the case with the endurance ratings on many of the newest drives. A prime example: The Samsung 9100 Pro 2TB has an endurance rating of 600TBW - they anticipate the drive will last for 600TB of information written to the drive total. The Silicon Power US75 2TB has an endurance rating of 2400TBW. This is the Achilles Heel of the Samsung drive for someone like a video editor, who could really use the sustained speed. Which would you choose for a long-term solution?

Conclusion: Don’t Overpay for Coziness

Are premium SSD brands worth the cost? For the average gamer, content creator, or general PC user, no. At ArsenalPC, we rely heavily on logic for purchasing decisions, buying NVMe SSDs with high speed, good endurance ratings, and an overwhelmingly positive feedback rating from customer reviews of the drives we find online.

The price premium is largely an investment in the “coziness factor”—a feeling of security and technical superiority that rarely translates into a noticeable difference in boot times, game loading, or application responsiveness. The best value NVMe SSDs now deliver near-maximum theoretical sequential performance for their interface generation (PCIe 4.0) at a significantly lower price point.

The informed buyer’s best strategy is to look beyond the brand name and focus on three key metrics:

  1. Speed (Focus on Random I/O): For gaming and general use, random read/write speeds are more important than peak sequential speeds. The average user rarely moves large files around which are written sequentially.
  2. Endurance and Warranty: Always check the TBW (Total Bytes Written) rating. A higher TBW combined with a 5-year warranty is a sign of a quality drive, regardless of the brand.
  3. Recent Customer Reviews: Look for reviews that test sustained performance and mention any long-term reliability issues for the specific model and capacity you intend to buy.

By making a logical decision based on data and value rather than an emotional decision based on brand name, you can equip your system with a high-performance SSD and keep the remaining funds for a more impactful upgrade, such as a better GPU, better CPU cooling, or more RAM.

Be sure to comment below your thoughts, opinions, feelings, questions, and concerns about NVMe SSD brands. Do you buy premium, or do you stick with the numbers? Let us know! Thanks for reading.


At ArsenalPC, we back all of our systems with a minimum of a 1-year warranty, and we often use a variety of SSD brands. If we’re willing to back our systems with our own warranty while equipping them with various brands, the average buyer should feel confident in buying whatever brand is available, so long as it checks all the boxes for speed, endurance ratings, warranty, and recent reviews.

Looking for a custom-built PC made just for you? Check out the ArsenalPC store at Newegg.com where we offer a large variety of boutique, custom-built PCs made-to-order!

image

1 Like

You reminded me of this video:

1 Like

very insightful… Honestly, my Top 3 are Western Digital, Samsung and Micron.

Do you have any insight on how M.2. Expansion cards effect their effectiveness?
Do you think Heatsink are necessary in most scenarios? ( Casual, gamer or video editing/content creation/streaming)

Very interesting that you continue to list Samsung in your top 3 favorites after learning about their consumer SSD longevity issue.

When you say M.2 expansion cards, if you’re talking about PCI Express cards that allow you to install additional M.2 NVMe SSDs? They’ll perform identically to being installed natively into the motherboard - but be wary of the PCIe generation of the slot you’re installing the expansion card into. As an example, on a Socket AM4 system your lower PCIe slots may only be running at Gen2.

The primary part of an NVMe SSD that benefits from cooling is the controller chip onboard. Gen3 controllers get warm, but not hot - they can be run without a heatsink and there will be minimal performance impact, if any. For Gen4 drives it depends upon the individual controller chip, as some of them are highly efficient and some of them aren’t; it’s always a good idea to stick with cooling for them to be on the safe side.
Gen5 drives require cooling. Without a heatsink, they’ll thermal throttle and perform worse than a Gen4 drive.

Hmmm, I think I include Samsung purely because they have a high quality compared to other drives. I do not use their pro line myself. I am actually running a SN750x in my build but I think the highest line for every product is kind of fluffing it.

There is also a use case scenario. I am primarily a gamer, but my SN750x is only 1tb but its used purely for the OS. I even redirect files to an SSD I assigned F for File system. My raw game clips go directly to D ( 2tb ),my games are installed to G drive ( 4tb SSD ). My content creation clips for to H 2tb. There is also an E drive i created, but its its only 100gb and its reserved for PC Backup saves. ( this use to be the same save place on my laptop and I just adopted doing so for my other builds )

Last questions… With motherboards moving some parts to the back of the board, where they have more space and better thermals, so you see us still using the 2280 format for connection but the NVME board itself, expanding or being stacked to give more storage space?

Zac, there are three levels of “use case” for drives, based upon the amount of overall writing to the drive:

  • Level 1 - very little data written on a repetitive basis. This would be a drive primarily containing game files, and maybe the save games. Typically the game gets downloaded and installed, and it stays there.
  • Level 2 - A moderate amount of data written to the drive, which happens on any OS drive. Updates and background downloads always go to this drive, so it experiences a moderate amount of writing.
  • Level 3 - A large amount of data is constantly written to the drive. This happens if the drive is used to store video files being actively edited, or if the drive holds the files for any AI model.

For your setup, you’re using a Western Digital SN750 1TB (there is no SN750x, it does not exist.) That has a 600TBW drive endurance rating, which is on-par with most new consumer drives, unfortunately about half to a third of drive endurance from just a few years ago. As an OS drive, it’s likely fine - particularly with how finely you’ve compartmentalized your file structure.

As far as components moving to the back of motherboards, thus far we’ve only seen NVMe slots on the back of Mini ITX motherboards since there’s no room on the front… for other back-facing items such as MSI’s Project Zero, all they did was move connectors to the back of the board. We don’t see a massive movement to mostly rear-facing components in the near future.

This is very informational, thank you.

question on level 1. If my drive is considered level 1 got gaming, but I have like, 25 games installed, and they all get updates every day/other day, would this push it into category 2 or is it still not as much write as OS updating and such?

I did also look over my drives I have, and i can not believe i misnamed my hardware!
These are the official parts

This is what I pulled from one of my online sources… IIRC, My File system is now on the WD Blue and the PNY 960s are in Raid for raw clips. The Backup drive? I no clue what I am using it for. I really am going to have to find this information in disk management when I get home and upload it :slight_smile:

UPDATE


I need another 4tb drive.

I feel like you should delete the games you don’t play…?

I don’t intend to sound rude, but there is no way you’re cycling through 3 TBs of videogames… I just realized that is like one COD install…

1 Like

Hmmm realistically, ill cycle through 4-5 games on my days off, 2-3 on work nights.

L4D2 and Cross out are almost daily games for me. Squad is about every other day if not every day. Outlast trials is fine when you have competent teams. Same with Rainbow, but its really only enjoyable first 2 weeks of the season.

Earlier this year, I lost an online friend unexpectedly and he ran our Valheim and Scum servers for 3 months. He was very knowledge in Databases and was really good with guitar.
Last year, I lost a very good friend of 10 years to cancer. Was was my mentor in Smite, my one and only twitch mod, content creator supporter, and just one of my bestest bros… I wish we had the chance to meet, and almost did at one point. One of his favorite games was Generation Zero. We were suppose to play The Division 2 together. I was having him complete the story line missions so I could power grind him to world 5 with me, but he only got 3/4 of the way before he got sick again…
These 4 games feel sacrilege to remove because of how many memories they have in them.

APB: Reloaded must stay. I will not negotiate.
Metal Gear Solid Delta, i streamed when it came out and might do another run for it soon. FF 7 Rebirth, I have some side quest to finish.
My friends went for arc raiders instead of Arena Breakout so Ill probably get rid of that one. Theyre also into BF6 so thats a keeper.
CS:GO is there just cause the reddit community thinks im a meme in game and occasionally request I play with them or for me to sign their profile.
I have to have the Counter strike, Day of Defeat and portals installed so Gmod can be stable. Why Gmod? sometimes, you just have to let loose… I will not explain.
I want to get better at Dark and Darker but I keep getting bad teams and the discord isnt that good cause they refuse to play with players who can not complete the quest.
Same with project Zomboid. I really want to get into this game but every community has like 200+ mods. I have like, 10 at most for myself. Its just hard finding a good community.
I just downloaded State of Decay 2 like 2 months ago to play the new maps with some people and then it never fell through.
I could uninstall DMC5 and Dead Space and COD. I havent played it in a long while.

This is just steam. I could rogue company on EGL, COD 2019 on battlenet and battlefront 2 on EA Launcher.